Streakbreak
Menu

Brand vs brand · prices dated · no fluency promises

Two apps enter. Your money picks one.

Streakbreak referees the brand-name language apps — Duolingo, Babbel, Rosetta Stone, Pimsleur — one matchup at a time. Dated prices from both storefronts, coverage checked against the vendors' own lists, and the free option named out loud whenever it's the honest winner.

This week’s card: any app vs any app
LESSON 12la casathe housedas HausSAY IT ALOUD¿Dónde está…?VS
Teaching depth30
Year-one price25
Speaking practice20
Language coverage15
Staying power10

100 points, published so you can argue with them. What an app teaches counts for more than what it charges — but the bill is a quarter of the fight.

Tonight’s undercard

Every matchup →

Why a whole site of head-to-heads

Because 'best language app' is the wrong question, and we'd rather answer the right one. Nobody torn between Babbel and Duolingo needs a twelve-app listicle; they need someone to put exactly those two in a ring, weigh the same five things for each, and say which corner wins for which learner. That's the whole format here: named brands, one decision per page, and a verdict you can disagree with because the working is shown.

The scorecard, published

Every matchup is scored out of 100 points, split five ways: Teaching depth carries 30 — whether an app explains and builds, or just drills. Year-one price carries 25, always the real billed amount with its read date and storefront, never the 'per month' marketing arithmetic. Speaking practice carries 20, because producing the language is where apps most often shortchange you. Language coverage carries 15 — an app that doesn't teach your language scores zero for you, whatever else it does. Staying power carries the last 10: the best app is the one still installed in March.

The weights are published so you can re-referee with your own. A casual learner should probably double the price weight; someone bound for Tokyo should treat coverage as a knockout rule, not 15 points.

The honesty rules we referee by

  • Every price carries a date and a storefront. These apps reprice constantly and the web checkout and App Store genuinely differ — an undated price is a rumour.
  • Sales are treated as the weather. Most of these vendors discount most of the year, so we quote list and note the pattern instead of shouting '60% off'.
  • The free option gets named whenever it's the right call — usually Duolingo, which runs no affiliate program and pays us nothing.
  • No fluency promises. No app makes you fluent by itself and we won't pretend otherwise; apps build the habit and the base, humans build the conversation.
  • No coupon pages, ever. Third-party codes are stale or unauthorized more often than not; the vendor's checkout carries the real price.

Start with the main event

Most readers arrive with the same three names, so start where they collide: Duolingo vs Babbel vs Rosetta Stone is the full three-way with the scorecard applied, and what Babbel actually costs pins down the bill the marketing arithmetic blurs. From there the undercard covers the pair-offs — Rosetta Stone vs Babbel, Pimsleur vs Babbel — and the questions people actually type, like is Babbel free and which apps even teach Japanese.

Judges' table: quick calls

Is Babbel better than Duolingo?
Better at teaching, usually; better at being free, never. Babbel is a paid, structured course — grammar explained, dialogues that build on each other — across 14 languages, while Duolingo is a free habit machine covering 40+ languages with ads and energy limits, and its free tier costs $0. If you will genuinely study, Babbel earns its bill; if you mostly need a daily nudge, keep Duolingo and your money. Duolingo has no affiliate program, so recommending it pays us nothing.
How much does Babbel cost right now?
On Babbel's own web checkout, read 23 September 2026: the annual plan is $8.95 a month billed as $107.40 for the year, the six-month plan is $13.45 a month billed as $80.70, and Lifetime is $299.99 once. The US App Store charges differently — $17.99 for one month of a single language, $107.99 for a 12-month all-languages plan. Babbel runs discounts most of the year, so treat any 'sale' price as the normal one and check the checkout you actually use.
Is Rosetta Stone worth it in 2026?
At the prices we read on its web checkout on 23 September 2026 — $19.99 a month, or $159 a year with all 25 languages included — it is worth it mainly if its all-immersion method suits you: lessons run in the target language with no translating, which some learners find clarifying and others find slow. There is a 14-day money-back guarantee on the web plans. If you want rules explained in English as you go, Babbel fits better.
Is Duolingo actually free?
Yes — the course content is usable without paying, supported by ads and limited by an energy system. The US App Store lists Super Duolingo in-app purchases from $9.99 to $119.99 depending on the plan, and Duolingo does not publish one standard price on a page we can read, so we print the range rather than a single number. Nothing about the free tier requires a card.
Which of these apps should I use for Japanese?
Not Babbel — its 14 languages include no Japanese, Korean or Chinese, per its own App Store listing read 23 September 2026. Duolingo, Rosetta Stone and Pimsleur all teach Japanese; Duolingo's free tier is the no-risk start, Rosetta Stone suits immersion learners, and Pimsleur is the audio-first option with a 7-day free trial. Our coverage matchup breaks down which apps carry which languages.